Categories
Crypto Daily Topic

A Definitive Guide to Bitcoin Forks and How to Claim Them

A split in the Bitcoin network is referred to as a Bitcoin fork. A Bitcoin fork results from an alteration of some original Bitcoin rules resulting in a similar coin with slight changes.

What is a BTC Fork?

The rules of the game are always changing in the Bitcoin Network, and that’s what BTC forks are about. A Bitcoin fork is the change of the existing Bitcoin code or protocol.  

Let’s say there is a universal game with a set of globally accepted rules, and then someone decides to change part of the rules. Some people will disagree with the changes while others accept the change.

This means there will be two versions of the game- one with the new rules and another with the old rules. This means there will be a fork in the game.

That is exactly what happened with the Bitcoin Code. So the fork means there is ‘New Bitcoin’ and ‘Original Bitcoin.’

Forks that allow new rules to be applied alongside the old rules are called soft forks. But not all forks are created this way. Some lead to the formation of a different coin altogether. These are what we call hard folks.

Bitcoin Cash Fork

The Bitcoin Cash fork happened in August 2017 when Bitcoin Cash(BCH), a new coin, came into existence. Bitcoin Cash’s block size was 8MB compared to Bitcoin’s original size of 1MB. This was meant to increase the number of transactions for each block.

A Step by Step Guide for Claiming BTC Forks

Claiming BTC forks is not a straightforward process. It entails enormous risks that only experienced traders can avoid. So before you proceed to claim them, you will require some safety tips and guidelines. Here are a few things you need to know.

Step 1- Safety Tips and Important Guidelines

Claiming these coins can put your privacy at risk because it exposes all the data on your BTC holdings to several networks. However, observing the guidelines below can help protect your financial information and reduce the risks considerably.

i) Guideline 1- Use a new wallet

Before you commence the claiming process, you must transfer the BTC fork coins to a new wallet with an entirely new seed recovery phrase.

As you may know, you’ll be required to share the private keys of your BTC wallet during the claiming process. This means you are giving the claiming tool access (keys) to your wallet. Some malicious software can capture this data and later access your active BTC wallet and drain the remaining BTC. So using a new wallet with different private keys from your main wallet will cushion you from any harm or possible Bitcoin theft.

ii) Guideline 2- Risk vs. Reward of Claiming

It should be clear by now that claiming BTC forks is a risky and complicated venture. So before claiming the coins, ask yourself if it’s worth the hassle. You should only proceed if you think the reward outweighs the risk.

But how can you tell if the reward is worth it? Well, this will require you to make a personal decision. For instance, if you own 0.5 and are eligible for 0.5 BTC Gold, then the profit may not be worth the risk. So check what you have against what you are eligible for to decide.

To make an informed risk-reward ratio decision, the following are some factors you should consider.

a) Fork Height

This refers to the time and date a fork occurred. Only the address in a Bitcoin that contains a value at the time of the fork will receive forkcoins. BTC addresses with no value at the time of the fork or those that receive the value after will not be eligible for forkcoin rewards.

b) Reward Ratio

Typically, the amount of forkcoins awarded is directly proportional to the bitcoin in the address. For example, if you have 1.582 BTC, you will be awarded 1.582 forkcoins. However, this ratio can vary, so be sure to check before claiming the forkcoins.

c) Market availability

Some forkcoins, particularly the major ones, have ready markets thanks to their rigorous advertisements and partnerships. This means you can trade your coins immediately after you claim them.

The small unknown forks, on the other hand, can be challenging to trade. Some are even untradeable. In the end, you remain with your forkcoins with nowhere to take them. So do the due diligence to check the available markets before claiming your forkcoins.

iii) Guideline 3- Select a Trusted Guide

There are many people out there who are after ripping you off your Bitcoin. To be on the safe side, only follow guides from the trusted and well-known wallets like Ledger.

Alternatively, you can use the information available in credited publications. While most of these publications are trustworthy, they will not be held responsible in case you lose your Bitcoin. Therefore, be sure to cross-check any information you get from publications before using it.

Step 2- Preparations

There are essential initial preparations to undertake when claiming your BTC forkcoins. They include;

i) Exporting your private keys

To claim your coins, you must export the private key in a compatible format with the import tool. To do this, you can follow the instructions available on your wallet’s documentation.

In cases where you cannot export the private keys, as is the case with hardware wallets, you may be required to input the wallet’s seed recovery phrase in another tool and run it offline. One such tool is Ian Coleman’s BIP39 Tool.

ii) Check and add only claimable keys

You don’t have to import all private keys for claiming. Some don’t have any value, and you will save time by excluding them. Tools like findmycoins.ninja can help you gauge the value of your Bitcoin addresses before claiming.

Step 3- Claiming Process

One way to claim your forkcoins involves downloading the authorized wallet of the forkcoins, then importing the private keys. This process has several downsides. First, it is time-consuming, and second, it may expose you to malware.

There are faster and safer DIY methods that you can use. The two commonly used methods are;

i) BitPie and Bither

These two wallets go hand in hand. You can use the Bither to extract your forkcoins and sell them through BitPie

The two wallets are reliable. For instance, Bither is available on Bitcoin.org site and can be used on Android smartphones and desktops. BitPie, on the other hand, is available for Android users. For users without android smartphones, you can operate the wallet on your desktop, but first, you should install the BlueStacks Android emulator.

ii) Ymgve’s fork claimer

Ymgve’s is another excellent DIY method to claim your forkcoins. Ymgve’s script is the most preferred method because besides having lower mining fees compared to BitPie/Bither, it also supports SegWit addresses and allows users to transfer coins to any address. This includes sending the coins directly to the account of the exchanging party.

While this method has many benefits, it isn’t very easy to operate. You will be required to use a command-line where you will input up to 180 characters for every address.

Conclusion

Bitcoin forks are slight changes made to the original bitcoin to get a coin with different rules. While these forks have made it easier for users to claim coins, it has also become even easier to get conned. It is advisable to do thorough research before claiming your BTC forkcoins.

Once you’ve decided it’s safe to claim your coins, there are two common DIY methods to use – which are BitPie and Bither or Ymgve’s fork claimer. While you get a ready market for using the former, it is cheaper to use the Ymgve’s fork claimer method.

With time, we should expect to see more forks coming up. This means we should be keener when choosing which forks to invest in to prevent issues when claiming for the coins as well as to avoid being scammed.

Categories
Crypto Daily Topic

Bitcoin Cash ABC vs. Bitcoin Cash SV – Examining the Bitcoin Cash Hash War

The debate about Bitcoin’s scalability began almost with its very inception. A few years later, that debate tore the Bitcoin community right down the middle. The core of the matter was Bitcoin’s 1MB block size. Satoshi wrote a 1MB limit on the code to prevent the block size from being up to miners’ discretion, which would lead to some miners producing bigger blocks than others and potentially causing the chain to split.

However, Satoshi certainly didn’t envision the firestorms that would later erupt out of this issue. As transaction volumes increased on the chain, it became clear that some things needed to change. But what would change, and how, was the main bone of contention in the community.

This contention gave birth to the Bitcoin Cash hard fork, which, paradoxically, later split into Bitcoin Cash ABC and Bitcoin Satoshi’s Vision – for the same reasons Bitcoin Cash had split from Bitcoin.

What was the lead up to this perplexing chain of events? Let’s dive into the famous ‘hash war,’ how it began, its implications, and its conclusion.

What is Bitcoin Cash, and Its Origin? 

Before we delve into Bitcoin cash and its origin, we need to look at the events that precipitated its creation. These events are the scalability issues facing Bitcoin and the disagreements among ‘factions’ in its camp as to how to address them. 

Bitcoin’s block size limit of 1MB meant that as the network grew in popularity and more people used the network, the network became clogged, leading to slow transactions and high transaction fees. It also meant the network couldn’t compete with payment models like Visa, which processes thousands of transactions per second, as compared to Bitcoin’s seven transactions per second. 

This issue meant a scaling solution had to be created. The problem is the Bitcoin community couldn’t come to a consensus as to how it would be done. One group wanted to maintain the 1MB block sizes and look for a scaling solution that would operate off of the main blockchain. The other group wanted to increase the block size and allow for more transactions in each block while keeping transaction fees low. However, this idea was met with censorship and indignation from the other group.

In 2017, Bitcoin had achieved mainstream status, and its popularity had grown more than ever. The foreseen transactions backlog that would slow down the network were now a reality. Network users were already complaining of several days waiting time before their transactions could be confirmed. For your transaction to be confirmed fast, you had to pay higher transaction fees. This also meant that Bitcoin could not be relied upon to conduct everyday transactions like micropayments. 

At this point, one camp suggested ‘Bitcoin Unlimited,’ an upgrade to increase block sizes. The other camp suggested a Segregated Witness (SegWit), an off-chain technology that would retain the block size, but also allow for faster transactions. 

However, Bitcoin Unlimited meant the network had to hard-fork, which meant the new version would not be compatible with the older version, and users all over the world would have to migrate to the new version. The SegWit camp preferred to maintain the status quo and maintain Satoshi’s version, whilst working on a solution that wouldn’t necessitate hard-forking. Bitcoin Unlimited also meant that miners with large processing power would have an unfair advantage over those with limited resources – which was against the democratization that Satoshi envisioned. 

The SegWit’s camp idea was to ‘segregate’ some part of the transaction (mainly transaction signatures) and store it outside the main chain, hence creating more space in each block. SegWit proponents viewed it as a less risky approach. However, the opposite camp saw it as a temporary solution to a permanent problem. 

The 2017 Hard Fork and SegWit2x

On August, 1, 207, the vast majority of Bitcoin miners indicated their support for SegWit2x. SegWit2x meant a potential implementation of SegWit with an agreement to later increase the block size limit to 2MB. 

However, a pseudonymous contributor going by ‘Shaolin Fry’ suggested a user-activated soft fork (UASF) that would implement SegWit without the contribution of miners. A UASF would comprise users, Bitcoin exchanges, and Bitcoin businesses. Since the users outnumber miners, it was clear a SegWit implementation was going to be effected without the participation of miners. (Miners were against SegWit because it would supposedly expose a ‘covert’ algorithm that ASIC mining machines were using to boost their processing speeds). 

Even then, a part of the community was not satisfied with SegWit – electing to initiate a hard fork of the Bitcoin chain. The new blockchain was called Bitcoin Cash, and it has an 8MB block size compared with Bitcoin’s 1MB. Bitcoin Cash went on to become one of the most successful cryptocurrencies, entering the top ten in terms of market capitalization. 

Bitcoin Cash developers envisioned a blockchain that allowed faster transactions and hence be used as a payment system for everyday transactions. The argument was Bitcoin can be an investment asset, but Bitcoin Cash can be a cheaper and faster payment model as compared to the traditional system. This, they argued, was what Satoshi had intended. 

One Year Later, More Block Size Limit Wars 

When the world thought the Bitcoin block size push-and-pull was over, Bitcoin Cash itself split into Bitcoin Cash ABC (ABC for Adjustable Blocksize Cap) and Bitcoin Cash SV (SV for Satoshi’s vision). Bitcoin Cash ABC proponents wanted to further increase the block size as well as enable the running of smart contracts on the platform. 

Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCH ABC) has implemented some changes such as Canonical Transaction Ordering Route (CTOR). CTOR means that transactions are arranged by following a dictionary sequence, as opposed to the Topological Transaction Ordering Route (TTOR) used by Bitcoin. CTOR is supposedly a more effective and elegant way of arranging transactions. Bitcoin Cash ABC also maintained the simpler name ‘Bitcoin Cash.’ 

But not everyone was enthusiastic about the idea of making the BCH blockchain a smart contracts platform. The leader of the anti-BCH ABC crowd was Craig Wright, a controversial figure who insists he’s the original creator of Bitcoin (earning himself the pejorative moniker ‘Faketoshi’). Another vocal critic of BCH ABC was Calvin Ayre, owner of the powerful mining entity, Coingeek. On his part, Ayre argued that miners would not pick up CTOR. 

The anti-BCH ABC camp led to the creation of Bitcoin SV. The BSV camp argued that it represented the true vision of Satoshi Nakamoto. The new version also had some upgrades to facilitate faster transactions. 

The two most prominent figures in the BCH camp were Roger Ver and Jihan Wu. Ver is the owner of Bitcoin.com, the Bitcoin exchange, while Jihan Wu is the co-founder of Bitmain, a Bitcoin hardware manufacturer owner of mining company Antpool. 

Hash Wars

After the hard forks, what followed next was a battle on who would get to keep the BCH ticker. With both sides having heavyweight owners of mining companies, a ferocious war was impending. Each side used their mining power on their chains to push liquidity of each crypto in the market – hence the name ‘hash rate war.’

Soon, however, the hash war came to naught – with both sides burning millions of dollars into a mining contest that incurred losses amounting to millions, for both forks. According to bitcoinist.com, BCHSV incurred a loss of $2.2 million, while accruing a negative profit margin of 441%.On its part, BCHABC incurred $1.3 million in losses and a negative profit margin of 51%.

Both sides also implemented replay protection on their respective chains to prevent accidental use of coins on both chains by users.

The hash wars also hurt the whole cryptocurrency market. Bitcoin, in particular, tanked to its lowest level that year. And major crypto exchanges like Coinbase, Kraken, and Bittrex assigned the BCH ticker to the BCHABC hard fork.

The BSV side soon agreed to let go of the ‘Bitcoin Cash’ name as well as the BCH ticker and reluctantly agreed to adopt the name ‘Bitcoin SV’ and the BSV ticker.

The two coins went on to compete against each other in the market, just like any other cryptocurrencies.

Bitcoin Cash VS Bitcoin SV Today

After the war between the two coins, Bitcoin Cash stayed ahead in terms of price and market capitalization. Some crypto exchanges like Kraken and Binance have gone on to delist BSV.

BSV surprised everyone in early 2020 by surging past 300% to a price of $372 and briefly overtaking Bitcoin Cash to become the fourth largest crypto by market cap. Many people speculated the rise in BSV is attributable to Craig Wright’s current legal woes – which have helped increased publicity for the coin.

But BCH has since reclaimed its position over BSV. As of January 27, 2020, BCH is trading at $368.55, with a market cap of $6, 724, 517, 583, while BSV is trading for $284.05 with a market cap of $5, 176, 171, 633.

Final Thoughts

We don’t know who Satoshi is, but we’re certain he didn’t anticipate, neither would he have liked the acrimonious factions that arose out of his 1MB block size idea, and one that threatened to bring Bitcoin on its knees. Thankfully, Bitcoin has since rebounded from the hash war implications, as have the two hard forks that arose out of it. We can only wait and see future dynamics playing between both hard forks.